CryptoZink
AllAIMemesDeFiGeneralTradingLaunch

10x Opportunities with Established DeFi Protocols

April 2, 2025defi

Since January 1, 2025, many well-established DeFi tokens have suffered significant price declines. However, a closer look at fundamental indicators – increasing Total Value Locked (TVL), rising user activity, ecosystem expansions, and upcoming upgrades – reveals several projects with strong recovery potential. Below we analyze a selection of top DeFi platforms that, despite recent price drops, demonstrate bullish catalysts for future growth. Each project section covers an Overview, Recent Price Performance, Key Bullish Catalysts, TVL Trends & User Growth, and a Conclusion with Risk Considerations.

ProjectTokenCurrent PriceYTD ChangeTVLPrimary FunctionKey Catalysts
AaveAAVE$168-170-50-55%$33-35BLending protocolAave v4, GHO stablecoin expansion, multi-chain deployments
MakerDAOMKR$1,330-15-20%$6-7BStablecoin issuer (DAI)Endgame/SKY rebrand, RWA expansion, high protocol revenue
UniswapUNI$6.0-50%$4-5BDecentralized exchangeUniswap v4 hooks, multi-chain expansion, Base network growth
LidoLDO$0.88-40-50%$10-12BLiquid stakingLido V3 (stVaults), ETH staking growth, DeFi integrations
Curve FinanceCRV$0.54-20-25%$1.8-2.3B*Stablecoin DEXcrvUSD adoption, "Curve Wars" incentives, multi-chain growth
*Ethereum TVL only; total cross-chain TVL estimated at $4B+ All data as of early April 2025

Aave (AAVE)

Overview

Aave is a leading decentralized lending protocol that allows users to earn interest on deposits and borrow crypto assets. Launched in 2020, Aave pioneered features like flash loans and multi-collateral lending. It has since expanded across multiple networks (Ethereum, Polygon, Avalanche, and more) and consistently ranks among the largest DeFi platforms by TVL. As of early 2025, Aave is the second-largest crypto lending platform (behind MakerDAO), underpinning leverage and liquidity for the DeFi ecosystem. The protocol's governance token AAVE plays a role in managing the platform (e.g. setting parameters) and accrues value from Aave's usage.

Recent Price Performance (since Jan 1, 2025)

Weekly price chart for AAVE (USD) showing the late-2024 peak and Q1 2025 correction.
AAVE's token surged to close out 2024, reaching a cycle high of about $399 in December 2024. However, 2025 flipped the script: AAVE entered a sharp correction through Q1 2025. By late January, it had already fallen under $300, and by mid-March it bounced off support around $175. As of early April 2025, AAVE trades near $168-170, roughly 50-55% below its January 1 level (and ~75% below its 2021 all-time high of $665). This significant drawdown reflects the broader crypto market volatility in Q1. Despite the price tumble, AAVE remains up ~35% year-on-year due to its strong 2024 performance. The recent stabilization in late March suggests the decline has slowed, potentially finding a floor around current levels.

Key Bullish Catalysts

Several fundamental developments signal a potential rebound for Aave. First, the platform achieved record adoption in late 2024 – net deposits (liquidity supplied) hit a new all-time high of $35 billion across markets. This growth came as Aave expanded to new networks (such as Scroll, BNB Chain, ZkSync Era, and others) and introduced its own over-collateralized stablecoin GHO. In 2025, Aave is continuing this expansion: governance has approved deployments on six+ new chains, including Layer-2 networks like Mantle, Linea, and even non-EVM chains like Aptos. Each new deployment can attract fresh liquidity and users, strengthening Aave's multi-chain footprint.

Notably, Aave's technical upgrades also fuel optimism. The community has been discussing Aave v4, a major protocol update aimed at improved modularity, capital efficiency, and reduced governance overhead. While still in proposal stages, Aave v4 (dubbed "Aave 2030") represents a long-term vision for the platform's evolution. More immediately, Aave v3 continues to roll out on various networks – for example, Aave V3 launched on Celo in March 2025 and hit its supply cap within 24 hours due to high demand. The launch of Aave's GHO stablecoin is another catalyst: after debuting on Ethereum in mid-2024, GHO is set for cross-chain expansion to networks like Base and Avalanche in the coming months. A successful stablecoin can drive borrowing demand and fee revenue for Aave. In short, continued innovation (new markets, new products) and Aave's reputation position it well to benefit from any DeFi market recovery.

TVL Trends and User Growth

Despite AAVE's price decline, usage of the Aave protocol remains robust. As of early 2025, Aave's TVL (total deposits) stands near all-time highs. The protocol's combined liquidity was around $33–35 billion at the end of 2024, reflecting strong user trust. (For context, roughly one-fifth of all DeFi value is locked in lending platforms like Aave, Compound, and others.) Even during the Q1 2025 downturn, Aave continued to facilitate large volumes of borrowing – over $8 billion is currently borrowed against its pools – indicating sustained demand for its services. High borrowing activity means lenders are earning yield, which can attract more depositors. Aave also consistently ranks among the top DeFi dApps by revenue (interest paid by borrowers); such revenue can eventually benefit AAVE token economics if fee-switch or buyback mechanisms are instituted.

User base and market reach are growing as well. Aave's expansions to Layer-2 networks and alternative chains have broadened its user community beyond Ethereum. This multi-chain strategy paid off with net new deposits from yield seekers on those ecosystems. Additionally, Aave has a large staked AAVE safety module (~$450M staked) providing security, and it enabled features like flash loans, which have been widely used (over $5B in flash loans in 2024). The continuous addition of collateral types and integrations (e.g. with institutional partners for real-world asset lending) is further evidence of an active, growing ecosystem. In summary, Aave's TVL remains high – on the order of tens of billions – and user activity (deposits and borrows) has stayed resilient. This divergence between declining token price and healthy usage metrics suggests the market may be undervaluing Aave's fundamental strength.

Conclusion / Risk Considerations

Aave's core position in DeFi lending and its aggressive expansion plans make a strong case for long-term value, even though the AAVE token's start to 2025 has been weak. If overall crypto markets stabilize or turn bullish, AAVE could recover on the back of its hefty TVL, steady revenue, and upcoming product launches. The protocol's ability to consistently attract liquidity and expand to new frontiers is a bullish sign. Nevertheless, risks remain. Competition in lending is increasing – rivals like Compound, or newer entrants (e.g. Frax Lend, Maple for undercollateralized loans, etc.), could chip away at Aave's market share. Also, the DeFi lending segment is sensitive to broader market leverage; a prolonged crypto bear market could suppress borrowing demand (affecting Aave's fees) and put pressure on AAVE's price. Smart contract exploits are another perennial risk, though Aave has so far maintained an excellent security record. Finally, any regulatory moves against DeFi lending or stablecoins (like GHO) could pose headwinds. On balance, Aave's strong fundamentals and development roadmap provide reason to be optimistic about recovery, as long as it continues adapting to the evolving DeFi landscape.

MakerDAO (MKR)

Overview

MakerDAO is the decentralized credit protocol behind the DAI stablecoin – one of DeFi's cornerstone stablecoins. Maker allows users to mint DAI by depositing collateral (ETH, tokenized real-world assets, etc.) into vaults, effectively acting as a crypto-backed central bank. Launched in 2017, MakerDAO is among the oldest DeFi projects and has a reputation for robustness and over-collateralization. Its governance token, MKR, is used to regulate the system (setting fees, collateral types) and backstop DAI's stability (MKR supply can be diluted if there are bad debts). In recent years, Maker has undergone a major "Endgame" overhaul, including plans to split into sub-DAOs and even rebrand MKR to a new token called "SKY" and DAI to "Spark USD" (USDS). Despite these changes, Maker's core value proposition remains enabling a decentralized, stable medium of exchange (DAI) with over $5 billion DAI in circulation as of Q1 2025.

Recent Price Performance (since Jan 1, 2025)

MKR saw a substantial rally in 2024 (tied to Maker's Endgame narrative and revenue growth), but it began cooling off before 2025. In the first week of January 2025, MKR traded around the $1,600+ level and briefly dropped below $1,100 amid a market pullback. Through Q1 2025, MKR's price trend was choppy: it experienced a relief bounce in February (trading up towards ~$1,750 at one point) but then slid during the March market dip. By early April 2025, MKR hovers near $1,330. This is roughly a 15–20% decline from January 1 levels around $1,600, and well off its mid-2024 highs (MKR had spiked above $2,000 during a July 2024 surge). While MKR's YTD drop is not as extreme as some other DeFi tokens, it has notably lagged the broader market at times – for example, during an early 2025 mini-rebound, MKR was among the weaker performers, reflecting cautious sentiment. This underperformance, despite MakerDAO's strong fundamentals, hints that short-term factors (profit-taking after 2024's run-up, uncertainty around the token rebranding, etc.) have weighed on MKR's price.

Key Bullish Catalysts

MakerDAO's bullish case centers on its robust revenue and ongoing protocol upgrades. The protocol has become a cash cow in DeFi – primarily via stability fees (interest) on DAI loans and yields from investing collateral into real-world assets (RWA). MakerDAO is consistently among the top revenue-generating DeFi dApps, earning fees that rival or exceed Uniswap and Aave on many days. In one week of August 2024, for instance, Maker generated $6.9 million in fees, ranking fourth among all dApps. This revenue has enabled aggressive token buybacks and bolstered confidence in the system's financial health. A major catalyst is Maker's push into Real-World Assets: by onboarding real-world loans (to banks, funds, etc.) as collateral, MakerDAO has grown its RWA vaults above $1.2 billion. The RWA sector in DeFi jumped ~30% in early 2025, and Maker is at the forefront of this trend. These assets provide relatively stable yield, which directly benefits MKR via the Endgame buyback scheme (protocol profits are used to burn MKR, reducing supply).

Another bullish factor is the Endgame plan implementation. Maker is undergoing a major transformation that includes the creation of new sub-DAO tokens and eventually renaming MKR to SKY token. While such changes introduce uncertainty, they aim to improve Maker's decentralization and growth. For example, splitting into smaller sector-specific DAOs could foster faster innovation. The planned Maker "NewChain" (a dedicated blockchain for Maker's governance, possibly a fork of Solana per founder Rune's suggestion) is an ambitious upgrade in the pipeline. If executed successfully, these moves could unlock value – MKR holders may receive airdrops of new tokens (sub-DAO tokens or the new SKY token at a 1:24,000 conversion rate), and Maker's dominance in DeFi could grow as it positions itself as a all-in-one ecosystem (stablecoin + lending + investment DAOs).

Lastly, Maker's core product, DAI, continues to be in demand. DAI's circulating supply, around 5 billion, has remained relatively stable even as centralized stablecoins faced challenges. Maker has increased DAI's attractiveness by investing collateral into yield (e.g., US Treasury bills via partnerships) to pay DAI holders a savings rate. This DAI Savings Rate (DSR) was raised multiple times, which likely helped DAI maintain market share. Growing DAI usage or integration (for instance, as the stablecoin for new Layer-2 ecosystems or in institutional platforms) would directly translate into more fees for MakerDAO. In summary, the combination of high revenue (and buybacks), RWA expansion, and a bold upgrade roadmap positions MakerDAO for potential growth, which in turn could drive MKR's value higher.

TVL Trends and User Growth

MakerDAO's TVL primarily consists of the value of collateral locked in vaults to back DAI. This metric has been solidly high. As of early 2025, Maker's TVL is roughly $6–7 billion, making it one of the largest DeFi protocols. In fact, Maker alone accounts for about 10% of all value locked in DeFi (with total DeFi TVL around $60B in early 2025). This signals the market's trust in Maker's stability. The composition of Maker's TVL has also evolved – a sizable portion now comes from real-world asset vaults (such as loans to real estate or banks), adding diversification beyond crypto collateral. The DAI supply (a proxy for usage) has been climbing back up from its 2022–2023 lows, thanks to new collateral types and an attractive DAI Savings Rate drawing users to hold DAI.

In terms of user activity, MakerDAO's direct user count (vault owners) is relatively smaller (thousands of vaults) since minting DAI often involves large, savvy players. However, indirect usage of Maker is massive: whenever someone holds DAI or uses DAI in DeFi, they are implicitly using MakerDAO. Maker has also focused on institutional integration, bringing in real-world borrowers and big investors. For instance, in 2024 Maker inked deals with traditional finance firms to park their funds as collateral for DAI, indicating growing cross-over adoption. Maker's governance community remains one of the most active, with high turnout on proposals – this shows engaged MKR holders which is important for decentralization. Moreover, the Endgame plan's sub-DAOs could bring in new participants interested in specific verticals (like an RWA-focused DAO, etc.), effectively expanding the Maker ecosystem's user base.

The TVL trend for Maker has been increasing or stable even during market dips – a bullish divergence. Over the last year, Maker's TVL climbed from about $4B to over $6B, partly due to the addition of real-world collateral. This momentum continued into 2025. Such resilience suggests that while speculative interest in MKR token can wane, the utilitarian demand for DAI and the protocol's services remains strong.

Conclusion / Risk Considerations

MakerDAO's fundamental picture – high TVL, real revenue, and a pivotal role in DeFi – paints a positive outlook for MKR recovery. If the broader DeFi market rebounds, MKR could benefit disproportionately as investors seek tokens with proven value backing. The planned tokenomics changes (burns and new token distributions) might also create positive supply dynamics for MKR (e.g., continued MKR buybacks reduce supply). However, there are notable risks. Execution risk on the Endgame is high: splitting the protocol into multiple pieces and rebranding the token could confuse investors or lead to technical hiccups. If the community fails to effectively launch the new "SKY" token or if sub-DAOs underperform, Maker could lose momentum. Additionally, Maker's heavy venture into real-world assets introduces legal and counterparty risk – for example, if a borrower defaults or if regulators crack down on the linking of crypto with traditional securities, Maker could face losses or forced adjustments. Regulatory risk extends to DAI itself: as a stablecoin that partially relies on assets like USDC and Treasuries, Maker must navigate possible stablecoin regulations or restrictions on crypto-bank interfaces. Finally, competition in the stablecoin arena (Curve's crvUSD, Aave's GHO, algorithmic stablecoins, etc.) means Maker cannot be complacent. It will need to continue innovating to maintain DAI's relevance. In conclusion, MakerDAO is a blue-chip DeFi project with strong fundamentals, and while MKR's price has slumped in early 2025, the platform's growth initiatives could make it a prime candidate for recovery – provided it manages the considerable strategic risks ahead.

Uniswap (UNI)

Overview

Uniswap is the largest decentralized exchange (DEX) protocol, famous for popularizing the Automated Market Maker (AMM) model. It allows users to swap ERC-20 tokens trustlessly and provide liquidity to earn fees. Uniswap's UNI token governs the protocol. Since launching in 2018, Uniswap has grown to dominate DEX trading – it accounts for a significant majority of decentralized trading volume on Ethereum and has expanded to multiple chains (Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, and in 2023, BNB Chain and Base, among others). Uniswap is often seen as a barometer for DeFi activity due to its broad usage. By early 2025, Uniswap held around $4.5 billion in liquidity across its pools and had facilitated over $1 trillion in cumulative trading volume. It remains a top protocol by both TVL and user count, symbolizing the success of permissionless finance.

Recent Price Performance (since Jan 1, 2025)

UNI had a volatile start to 2025. In the first week of January 2025, UNI briefly spiked to around $15.4 before a market-wide pullback saw it drop below $10.5 – levels not seen since 2021. By late January, UNI was trading around the $12 mark and testing major support. Once that $12 support gave way, bearish momentum picked up. Through February and March 2025, UNI's price steadily declined amid general selling pressure on altcoins. As of early April 2025, UNI is around $6.0 (down roughly 50% from January 1). This represents a steep drawdown, underscoring how sentiment shifted – Uniswap went from a late-2024 upswing (when DeFi tokens rallied) to a Q1 2025 drawdown. Notably, Uniswap's TVL also slipped alongside price, reflecting some liquidity leaving during this period. Between November 2024 and early 2025, Uniswap's TVL fell from about $4.9B to $3B amid the market turmoil. By March, both UNI's price and TVL appeared to stabilize at lower levels, suggesting that the worst of the capitulation might be over. The UNI token is now ~86% below its all-time high of $44.92 set in May 2021, indicating substantial room for recovery if the DEX sector strengthens.

Key Bullish Catalysts

Uniswap's future prospects are bolstered by technical upgrades, cross-chain growth, and entrenched market position. A major catalyst is the launch of Uniswap v4, announced and deployed in late January 2025. Uniswap v4 introduces "hooks," a groundbreaking feature that allows custom logic to be inserted into liquidity pools (enabling dynamic fees, TWAMM orders, on-chain limit orders, etc.). It essentially transforms Uniswap into a developer platform where anyone can extend AMM functionality. This upgrade also drastically reduces gas costs – creating new pools is up to 99.99% cheaper than in v3, and swapping is more gas-efficient (especially for multi-hop trades and ETH pairs). By lowering costs and increasing flexibility, v4 aims to attract more liquidity and trading activity (developers can build novel pool types that were previously impossible). The successful rollout of Uniswap v4 across 10 networks simultaneously – including Ethereum mainnet, multiple Layer-2s (Arbitrum, Optimism, Base), and even alternative L1s (Polygon, Avalanche, BNB Chain, etc.) – is a huge bullish development. It cements Uniswap's reach: users on many chains can now use Uniswap's latest version. This broad deployment also helps Uniswap stay ahead of competitors by capturing mindshare and volume wherever the users are.

Another catalyst is Uniswap's continued volume and user growth on emerging chains. For instance, Uniswap on Coinbase's Base network saw record volumes in late 2024 and January 2025, hitting $15.7 billion monthly volume on Base in January (the third consecutive monthly ATH on that network). This indicates that as new ecosystems gain traction (like Base), Uniswap is often the DEX of choice, capturing the trading activity. High volume on Layer-2s not only drives fee revenue (which could eventually accrue to UNI via fee switch governance), but also proves Uniswap's adaptability. Furthermore, Uniswap's brand and liquidity network effect are strong bullish factors. It continues to list practically every token (long-tail assets), enabling it to benefit from trading frenzies (e.g., memecoin booms or new token launches). Uniswap is often at the center of hype cycles – increased user activity during those times can lead to bursts of protocol fee generation and spotlight the UNI token's value if governance were to turn on fee-sharing.

Additionally, Uniswap's ecosystem is growing: The Uniswap Foundation (established 2022) and various grants have been nurturing projects that build on Uniswap (analytics tools, liquidity management like Arrakis/Gelato, mobile wallets, etc.). A thriving ecosystem increases Uniswap's moat. The fact that Uniswap has processed $1.2B+ in daily trading volume even in the recent "quiet" markets speaks to its dominance. Should crypto markets rally or on-board more users (perhaps via improved UX or real-world asset trading on DEXes), Uniswap is poised to capture that upside. In summary, the v4 upgrade, multi-chain presence, and sustained large trading volumes form a compelling set of bullish drivers for Uniswap. These factors suggest that UNI's weak price may be more due to macro conditions than any project-specific issues – the fundamentals of usage remain strong.

TVL Trends and User Growth

Uniswap's TVL (liquidity in its pools) and user metrics provide a nuanced picture. After a dip at the end of 2024, liquidity has started to recover in some pools thanks to the deployment of v4 and improved fee opportunities. Uniswap's TVL is roughly $4–5 billion in early 2025 across all chains. This liquidity is highly decentralized across many pools and tokens, highlighting Uniswap's role as the go-to exchange for countless assets. While $4.5B is below Uniswap's peak TVL in 2021, it still dominates the DEX space – Uniswap holds the largest share of DEX liquidity and volume of any single platform.

Crucially, Uniswap's trading volume relative to its TVL remains very high (often a daily volume/TVL ratio > 0.2 on Ethereum), meaning the capital in Uniswap is utilized efficiently to generate fees. Daily trading volumes around $1.2B indicate heavy user activity. Millions of trades are executed monthly on Uniswap, and the number of unique users (addresses) interacting with Uniswap has steadily grown, crossing well into the hundreds of thousands. The introduction of Uniswap's own user wallet app (launched in 2023) and integration in popular interfaces have likely contributed to user retention and growth. On Layer-2 networks, Uniswap often sees higher user counts for small trades due to lower fees – the Base network example showed vibrant retail trading (memecoins, etc.). This is encouraging for user growth; it means Uniswap isn't just for whales on Ethereum, but is gaining everyday users on L2s.

Another aspect of Uniswap's growth is liquidity provider (LP) participation. Uniswap v3's concentrated liquidity was complex for some LPs, but we've seen an ecosystem of vaults and automated strategies (like Gamma, Arrakis) help manage liquidity provision. These services have kept or even increased the number of active LPs by making it easier to earn fees. As Uniswap v4's hooks enable new pool types (like maybe an on-chain limit order pool or dynamic fee pools), it could attract liquidity from even more sophisticated market makers or protocols. So, while TVL in USD terms fluctuated with token prices, the engagement of users and LPs remains strong. The fact that Uniswap's liquidity only fell ~10% when UNI price halved indicates many liquidity providers stayed through the downturn, likely due to continued fee earnings.

In summary, Uniswap's on-chain metrics show it maintaining a lion's share of DeFi trading activity. Its TVL trend has been resilient relative to some peers (still billions of dollars committed), and user numbers on new networks are climbing. These trends underscore that Uniswap as a platform is still growing in reach, even if the UNI token price hasn't reflected that in early 2025.

Conclusion / Risk Considerations

Uniswap's case is that of a market leader temporarily out of favor in the token market but fundamentally as strong as ever. The bullish indicators – major protocol improvements and sustained user traction – suggest UNI could rebound if overall conditions improve. However, investors should weigh some risks. Competitive risk is one: while Uniswap leads, competitors like Curve (for stable assets), SushiSwap, Balancer, or new aggregators continually try to siphon liquidity or volume. Uniswap's decision to enforce a Business Source License (BSL) on v3 (which expired in 2023) and now on v4 (until 2027) helps limit direct forks, but alternative DEX designs (like orderbook-based dYdX, or GMX for perps) target segments of Uniswap's market. If a competitor offers significantly better incentives or features, Uniswap could see a relative decline.

Regulatory risk is also pertinent. As the largest DEX, Uniswap has drawn regulatory attention before. Any unfavorable regulation on DEX operations or DeFi in general (e.g., requiring KYC or treating certain tokens as securities) could dampen Uniswap usage, though as a decentralized protocol it's somewhat insulated. Additionally, UNI's token economics currently don't include fee-sharing (all fees go to LPs, not token holders). This has been a point of debate. If no value accrual mechanism is ever enabled, UNI's value might rely purely on governance utility, which some investors may find speculative. On the flip side, if governance does activate protocol fees to UNI (even a small fraction of that $1B+ daily volume), it could materially boost UNI's intrinsic value – but this is uncertain and could raise its own regulatory questions.

Lastly, macro-level crypto market factors will influence UNI. DEX volumes generally rise in bull markets and fall in bear markets. If 2025 turns out to be broadly bearish, Uniswap's volumes and liquidity could stagnate or decrease, delaying any UNI recovery. Despite these risks, Uniswap's entrenched position and continuous innovation (v4) give it tools to adapt. In conclusion, Uniswap has strong recovery potential given its unmatched network effects in DeFi trading, but one should keep an eye on competitive developments and the long-term token value model as the sector evolves.

Lido (LDO)

Overview

Lido Finance is the leading liquid staking platform in DeFi, allowing users to stake cryptocurrencies (most notably Ethereum) and receive tokenized staking derivatives in return (e.g., stETH for staked ETH). These liquid tokens can be used in DeFi while the underlying remains staked, thus solving the liquidity problem of proof-of-stake. Lido initially launched for Ethereum 2.0 staking and has since expanded to support other chains (Polygon, Solana, Polkadot, etc.). Its Ethereum staking product has been hugely successful – as of Q1 2025, Lido controls roughly 27–30% of all staked ETH, by far the single largest staking provider. This equates to around 6–7 million ETH staked via Lido, underscoring its dominance. The Lido DAO governs parameters and whitelists node operators, with the LDO token serving as the governance token. LDO does not directly entitle holders to staking yields, but it has governance power over substantial treasury funds and fee parameters (Lido takes a 10% cut of staking rewards). Lido has become critical infrastructure for Ethereum, as well as a major DeFi building block (stETH is widely used as collateral across protocols).

Recent Price Performance (since Jan 1, 2025)

The LDO token saw a downturn in early 2025 in line with many DeFi assets. After a strong 2023 (when the Ethereum Shanghai upgrade unlocked staking withdrawals and boosted liquid staking demand), LDO peaked around the $2 range. By January 1, 2025, LDO traded approximately in the $1.50–$1.80 range (estimating from late 2024 momentum). However, as 2025 began, LDO started sliding and accelerated its decline in February and March. It hit a year-to-date low of about $0.81 on March 10, 2025. Currently, LDO is around $0.88 per token, having fallen roughly 40-50% since the start of the year. This places LDO about 70% down from its all-time high (which was near $3.30 in 2021). The price weakness can be attributed to general market sell-offs and perhaps concerns that LDO's token value capture is limited (no direct yield flow to LDO). Interestingly, Lido's two closest comparables – other liquid staking governance tokens like Rocket Pool's RPL or Coinbase's COIN (indirectly) – also underperformed in early 2025, suggesting a sector trend. Nonetheless, Lido's protocol usage (staked ETH) continued to grow during this period, indicating a divergence between token price and fundamental usage.

Key Bullish Catalysts

Several bullish factors could drive a turnaround for LDO. First, Ethereum staking participation is on an upward trajectory, and as the market leader, Lido stands to benefit disproportionately. Even after the Shanghai upgrade (which enabled withdrawals) removed uncertainty, the percentage of ETH staked is still relatively low (~20% of total ETH). Industry forecasts expect this to exceed 30-40% in coming years. Lido, currently holding ~27% of all staked ETH, could see absolute growth in staked ETH even if its market share remains steady or slightly declines. More ETH staked means more fees for Lido DAO and more adoption of stETH.

A concrete catalyst is Lido V3, whose plans were unveiled in February 2025. Lido V3 focuses on modular staking and opt-in restaking. It introduces staking vaults (stVaults) that allow for customized validator sets, fee structures, and even optional restaking of validators on other emerging layers. This upgrade is aimed at onboarding institutional stakers (by catering to compliance needs with customizable setups) and integrating with shared security services (like EigenLayer) in an opt-in way. In essence, Lido V3 could significantly expand Lido's addressable market: institutions who were hesitant may now stake via Lido with tailored conditions, and new use-cases for stETH (like being able to "restake" it to secure other networks) could drive demand. Additionally, Lido is creating a new governance arm (the Lido BORG sub-fundation) to oversee these growth initiatives, indicating a proactive approach to scaling.

Another bullish point is Lido's exploration of staking yield financialization. There have been hints (including from Lido's head of enterprise) about Ethereum staking-yield products like ETFs by 2025. If such traditional vehicles emerge and are based on liquid staking tokens, Lido could be a primary beneficiary or partner, funnelling more capital into stETH. Moreover, Lido continues to branch out into other assets: for instance, if future Layer 2 networks enable native staking or if other layer-1s gain traction, Lido could introduce liquid staking for those (Lido already signaled interest in expanding to networks like Cosmos or zkSync if feasible).

Finally, Lido's position as a DeFi primitive provides network effects. stETH is deeply integrated – it's used in Aave, Maker (as collateral for DAI), Curve (stETH/ETH pool is one of the largest), and many yield strategies. This creates a self-reinforcing loop: as more stETH is issued, more protocols integrate it, which makes holding stETH more attractive than regular ETH for yield seekers, leading to more staking with Lido. The revenue Lido DAO earns from its 10% fee on staking rewards is substantial – with ~6M ETH staked and ~4-5% staking yield on ETH, the DAO earns in the ballpark of 24,000+ ETH per year. While this isn't directly passed to LDO holders yet, the treasury growth strengthens Lido's ability to conduct buybacks or introduce token rewards down the line. The mere potential of LDO eventually getting a slice of that yield (via governance vote) remains a speculative catalyst that some investors consider. In summary, continued ETH staking growth, Lido's V3 improvements, and its entrenchment in DeFi form a strong bull case for Lido (and indirectly LDO).

TVL Trends and User Growth

Lido's TVL can be measured by the total value of staked assets across all supported networks. By far the largest contributor is staked ETH (stETH). As of early 2025, Lido's TVL is on the order of $10–12 billion (primarily from ETH; the figure fluctuates with ETH's price). Lido's TVL saw a dip in USD terms in Q1 2025 due to the decline in crypto prices (ETH price retreating) but the quantity of ETH staked via Lido reached all-time highs. This is a crucial point: the number of stETH in circulation has been increasing consistently, even if USD TVL momentarily fell. In January 2025, stETH supply surpassed 6 million ETH and has continued growing. This indicates that users are steadily adding to Lido – new deposits outpaced any withdrawals post-Shanghai (which is impressive, showing minimal churn out of Lido even when withdrawals became possible).

The user base for Lido (i.e., unique stakers) also broadened. Initially dominated by large holders (whales and exchanges), Lido has seen more retail participation thanks to liquid staking's popularity and the ability to stake any amount of ETH (no 32 ETH minimum). Many users who don't run validators choose Lido for convenience. On the backend, Lido has also expanded its node operator set to decentralize further – including community-run nodes and institutional validators in different jurisdictions. This helps address centralization concerns and in turn can attract more users who want a decentralized staking solution.

In terms of secondary usage, the DeFi usage of Lido's tokens exploded. stETH consistently maintains one of the highest lending market borrows on Aave (people use it as collateral to borrow ETH or stablecoins) and one of the deepest pools on Curve (stETH-ETH pool) facilitating easy swap between staked and unstaked ETH at a near parity rate. This deep integration means that acquiring or exiting stETH is relatively frictionless, which encourages more staking – a virtuous cycle for Lido's TVL. Additionally, Lido's liquid staking for other chains (like stMATIC for Polygon, stDOT for Polkadot) have seen moderate growth, adding to TVL and diversifying Lido's asset base.

To sum up, Lido's TVL trend is upward when measured in staked asset quantity, and moderately down then up in USD terms following ETH's price swings. User adoption continues to rise, solidifying Lido's position as the default staking solution for a significant portion of the market. By lowering staking barriers and integrating deeply with DeFi, Lido has cultivated a wide and sticky user base whose growth persisted through Q1 2025.

Conclusion / Risk Considerations

Lido's fundamental indicators – dominating share of a growing ETH staking pie, a pipeline of technical upgrades, and wide DeFi integration – suggest that the LDO token could see renewed interest if the market recognizes these strengths. As Ethereum staking grows, Lido's importance (and by extension, the value of participating in its governance via LDO) should theoretically increase. However, there are important risks. Centralization and governance risk is often cited: Lido's large share of ETH staking has raised concerns in the Ethereum community about consensus centralization. If Ethereum developers or the community were to implement measures to discourage any one entity from having too much stake (for example, social consensus against Lido in extreme scenario), that could negatively impact Lido. While such an outcome is unlikely, it's a topic of debate. Lido is attempting to mitigate this by adding node operators and encouraging rival liquid staking protocols, but the risk remains that Lido's success might be too great, prompting backlash.

Another risk is LDO token value accrual. Currently, LDO does not entitle holders to a portion of staking rewards; all rewards minus fees go to stETH holders and node operators, with Lido's cut going to a DAO treasury. The treasury is used for grants, insurance, etc., not directly for LDO buybacks (so far). If investors conclude that this model will persist indefinitely, LDO might trade more on governance premium/speculation than on cashflow fundamentals. There is a scenario where Lido DAO could vote to redirect some fees to LDO holders or do token burns, but that hasn't happened yet. Without it, LDO's value relies on governance power and indirect benefits (like controlling a large treasury). This makes the investment case a bit abstract compared to, say, a dividend-paying token.

Market competition is another factor. Competing liquid staking protocols (Rocket Pool, Coinbase's custodial staking, Frax ETH, etc.) are all vying for growth. Lido's share, while large, could be eroded if these alternatives offer something appealing (Rocket Pool emphasizes decentralization, for example, and has grown its share to ~8%). That said, Lido's network effect is strong, but competition could cap its market share or force fee reductions (Lido's 10% fee could be pressured if others charge less).

Regulatory environment also looms: Staking services have been scrutinized by regulators (e.g., the SEC action against Kraken's staking program in 2023). Lido, as a decentralized DAO, is harder to target, but increased regulation on staking or treating staking yield as securities could indirectly affect Lido's operations or limit certain users (especially institutions) from using it.

In conclusion, Lido presents a case where usage metrics are booming but the token market remains wary. If Lido continues to execute – shipping V3, maintaining its lead, and perhaps introducing token-holder rewards – LDO could see a strong recovery. Investors should watch for any governance changes about value distribution and track Ethereum's staking landscape for shifts. Lido's deep entrenchment in DeFi and alignment with a fundamental blockchain function (staking) give it a unique staying power, making LDO a compelling token to monitor as the market seeks out DeFi projects with real traction.

Curve Finance (CRV)

Overview

Curve Finance is a decentralized exchange protocol specialized in efficient swapping of assets that have the same value pegs (like stablecoin-to-stablecoin or wrapped asset swaps). Launched in 2020, Curve became known as the "stablecoin AMM" due to its low slippage, low fee pools for stablecoins and yield-bearing tokens. Liquidity providers on Curve earn trading fees as well as rewards (often CRV tokens and external incentives), and Curve's governance (via the CRV token and vote-escrow veCRV system) is famously used in "Curve wars" where various protocols compete for CRV gauge votes to boost their pool rewards. CRV is the governance token controlling pool parameters and fee distribution (a portion of trading fees is used to buy CRV for veCRV lockers, aligning token holders with the platform's trading volume). Curve has deployed on many networks (Ethereum mainnet, multiple Layer-2s, and other L1s like Avalanche, Polygon, Fantom, etc.), making it a ubiquitous piece of DeFi infrastructure. By early 2025, Curve supports not just pure stable swaps but also pools for pegged assets (like stETH/ETH, TriCrypto pool for BTC-ETH-stable) and even introduced its own over-collateralized stablecoin crvUSD in mid-2023. With a strong brand and one of the largest TVLs historically (peaking above $20B in 2021), Curve remains a top protocol, though it has faced challenges from the bear market and competitors.

Recent Price Performance (since Jan 1, 2025)

The CRV token has had a rough trajectory since the 2021 bull market, and Q1 2025 continued to be muted. At the start of 2025, CRV traded around approximately $0.70 (having risen from a late-2023 low of about $0.40 during a brief DeFi rally). As the market turned down in Q1 2025, CRV gradually slid. By April 2025, CRV is around $0.54 per token. This represents roughly a 20-25% decline year-to-date – not as severe as some other tokens, but still a significant drawdown. Notably, CRV's price has been under persistent sell pressure due to its tokenomics (continuous emissions to liquidity providers) and an overhang from a 2023 exploit: In mid-2023, Curve's founder's wallet was hacked, leading to a large amount of CRV potentially at risk of being dumped. Although a crisis was averted and much of that CRV got absorbed by backers, the event left a cloud over CRV's market supply. By 2025, those concerns have faded somewhat, but CRV hasn't broken out of the sub $1 range. During Q1 2025, Curve did not see a major pump; rather it traded in a relatively tight range ($0.5–$0.8) and slowly trended down. The price stability relative to others could imply most weak hands have exited earlier, but the lack of upside indicates that investors are waiting for fresh catalysts to re-rate CRV.

Key Bullish Catalysts

Curve's bullish thesis revolves around its critical role in DeFi liquidity and some new product initiatives. A key catalyst in late 2023 was the launch of crvUSD, Curve's native stablecoin. crvUSD is minted by depositing collateral (similar to DAI's mechanism) and has an innovative "AMO" pegging mechanism that automatically adjusts collateral positions during market moves. While crvUSD's launch was successful (it grew to a few hundred million in supply), its broader impact is expected to be seen in 2025 as adoption grows. If crvUSD gains significant usage, it can increase demand for Curve (to mint and swap the stablecoin) and generate new revenue (stability fees) for veCRV holders. The team has also built out features like crvUSD Savings – which was introduced to boost crvUSD's appeal by providing yield opportunities. In its first month, the Savings crvUSD feature showed positive results in scaling up Curve's stablecoin adoption. More adoption of crvUSD would not only be a fundamental win (adding another revenue stream beyond trading fees) but could also strengthen CRV's tokenomics (as fees from crvUSD could be diverted to CRV lockers in the future).

Another catalyst is Curve's continued expansion and partnerships. Curve remains the primary venue for stablecoin liquidity for new projects. For instance, when new algorithmic stablecoins or LSD tokens launch, they often seek a Curve pool and Curve DAO gauge to attract liquidity. In early 2025, we saw new pools like Liquity's LUSD v2 pool (the "Bold" pool) quickly attract liquidity and yield on Curve. These expansions keep Curve at the center of stablecoin innovation. Additionally, Curve's multi-chain presence means it can capture TVL and fees from multiple ecosystems. If Layer-2 solutions see growth in 2025, Curve on those L2s (like Arbitrum, Optimism) can benefit from increased stablecoin transfer activity.

Curve's incentive system (gauge voting via veCRV), often dubbed the "Curve Wars," is still a unique advantage. Many DeFi projects bribe veCRV holders to vote for their pool to receive CRV emissions, which underscores external demand for CRV/veCRV. This dynamic means there is an intrinsic bid for CRV from protocols that want influence over liquidity mining. If DeFi activity picks up, more projects will compete in Curve's gauge governance, potentially increasing demand for CRV (to lock as veCRV and get voting power). We already see protocols like Convex (CVX) serving as intermediaries in this system, but ultimately these amplify Curve's importance. A bullish scenario would be one where a new wave of stablecoins (maybe forex stablecoins or CBDC-wrapped tokens) come to Curve and engage in heavy bribing to build liquidity – this would remind the market of Curve's pivotal role and could drive CRV upward.

On the technical side, Curve is also improving its UI and integrating with aggregators, making it easier for users to access its pools. There was talk of a Curve-centric Layer-1 blockchain (using Substrate) for further development, though timelines are unclear – if such a "Curve Chain" comes to fruition, it could open new value accrual mechanisms for CRV (e.g., CRV as gas or staking token). Even absent that, Curve's protocol has a track record of security (aside from some front-end issues, the core AMM contracts have been solid). Given rising stablecoin volumes in DeFi (projected to surpass $100B annual DEX volume), Curve is well-positioned as a beneficiary due to its specialized efficiency for stable trades. All these factors serve as potential tailwinds for CRV if the broader environment cooperates.

TVL Trends and User Growth

Curve's TVL has fluctuated with the DeFi market. It was once the top protocol by TVL (over $15B in early 2022), but by early 2025 its TVL on Ethereum sits around $1.8–2.3 billion, plus additional liquidity on other chains. In the first quarter of 2025, Curve's TVL on Ethereum decreased from about $2.36B in late January to $1.83B in early March, largely due to underlying asset value declines (many pool assets like ETH, BTC, etc., fell in price) and some capital outflows seeking higher yields elsewhere. Despite this drop, Curve still holds one of the largest stableswaps for every major stablecoin pair, and liquidity providers often return when yields justify it.

The introduction of crvUSD has added a new source of TVL: users depositing collateral (like ETH or Frax ETH) to mint crvUSD. This is reflected in pools and the lending market "LlamaLend" for crvUSD that Curve set up (yield opportunities in crvUSD Lend were around 20% APY at times, drawing interest). As crvUSD supply grows, those collateral deposits effectively boost Curve's TVL.

On the user side, Curve's direct user base (liquidity providers and traders) tends to be more niche – often sophisticated DeFi users or other protocols. The number of unique Curve LPs is in the thousands. However, indirect usage of Curve is widespread: whenever users swap stablecoins via aggregators, they often route through Curve pools. For example, MetaMask or 1inch might route a USDC->DAI swap through Curve without the user realizing it. Thus, Curve's pools facilitate a large share of DeFi stablecoin volume behind the scenes. Daily volume on Curve's platform can range from a few hundred million to over a billion on volatile days, indicating many users benefit from Curve's low slippage trades even if they don't interface with it directly.

One metric of growth is the proliferation of pools and assets. Curve has expanded beyond the initial handful of stablecoins to host pools for various LSDs (stETH, cbETH, frxETH, etc.), cross-chain assets, and niche stablecoins. This breadth means it's capturing long-tail stablecoin projects as well. Whenever a new token wants stable liquidity, launching a Curve pool is a common strategy. For instance, in 2025, we see pools for newer assets like tBTC v2 (trustless BTC) pairing with crvUSD, showing Curve integrating the latest innovations.

In terms of revenue, Curve's trading fees (0.04% on stable swaps) are smaller per trade, but high volumes make it one of the higher fee-generating DEXs. These fees are partially used to buy CRV for veCRV lockers, which is effectively a buy-and-distribute mechanism, aligning with TVL/volume growth. If volumes pick up (e.g., more arbitrage, more stablecoin movement), fee revenue increases and can positively impact CRV (via more buybacks for veCRV rewards).

Summarily, Curve's TVL has decreased in USD during Q1 2025 but the platform remains fundamentally important with deep liquidity in core pools. User activity through integrations remains strong, and new features like crvUSD indicate that Curve is adding ways to engage users (borrowers, in this case) beyond just LPs and swappers. Should DeFi stablecoin activity grow again, Curve's TVL and usage would likely grow in tandem, given its central role.

Conclusion / Risk Considerations

Curve finds itself at an interesting juncture: it's a systemically important DeFi protocol with somewhat out-of-favor token dynamics. If one believes stablecoin and DeFi liquidity will be a growth area, Curve (and thus CRV) could be undervalued at current depressed prices. Its recovery potential hinges on renewed DeFi activity (especially in stablecoins and pegged assets) and the success of new products like crvUSD. The CRV token's value could also be bolstered if more protocol fees (from trading or crvUSD interest) start accruing to veCRV holders, increasing the appeal of holding/locking CRV.

However, risks should be carefully considered. Token inflation is a primary concern: CRV's emission schedule is heavy, with continuous liquidity mining rewards. This creates constant sell pressure that requires equally constant demand (from new users locking CRV or protocols bribing for votes) to offset. In a low-volume environment, inflation can outpace natural demand, suppressing price. So, a sustained turnaround in CRV may require either a pick-up in DeFi activity or a governance decision to adjust emissions.

Competition and changing DEX landscape pose another risk. Uniswap v3, with its concentrated liquidity, started capturing some stablecoin trading volume that might have gone to Curve in the past. Also, projects like Balancer (with stable pools) and emerging stable-swap competitors (like Saddle or new ones) can nibble at Curve's dominance. To date, Curve has defended its turf well, but the DEX market is evolving (e.g., Uniswap v4 hooks could theoretically be used to create Curve-like stable pools on Uniswap). Curve's relevance will depend on staying ahead in terms of pool offerings and efficiency. The good news is Curve's brand and existing liquidity give it a defensible moat, but it cannot be complacent.

Security is a perennial risk: while Curve's smart contracts have been reliable, any exploit in a major pool could be catastrophic given the pooled funds. Additionally, crvUSD is a new system – if it were to malfunction or depeg, it could harm trust in Curve's ecosystem. So far, nothing suggests issues, but new code always carries risk until battle-tested.

Finally, one must consider market sentiment. CRV's tokenomics (veCRV locking, governance wars) are complex. In euphoric times, this complexity was seen as a strength (encouraging "locking" reduces float, etc.), but in down times, some see it as a deterrent (long lockups in a bear market are unattractive). The sentiment could quickly change if DeFi turns bullish and "Curve wars" narratives reignite, but if not, CRV might remain sluggish.

In conclusion, Curve has a strong foundational role and multiple possible tailwinds (growing stablecoin use, crvUSD expansion, cross-chain growth), which could drive a recovery for CRV. It is a comparatively lower valuation now, with a lot of built infrastructure behind it. The risk-reward may favor patience: if one believes in DeFi's return, Curve is likely to be a major player, but until clear positive trends emerge, CRV's upside might take time to materialize. Potential investors should watch metrics like crvUSD adoption, Curve's share of stablecoin swaps, and governance developments. Curve's resilience through multiple cycles suggests it will be around for the next upswing – the key question is when the market will start pricing that in.

Sources